|
发表于 2016-7-14 17:16:50
|
显示全部楼层
Passage Two
When families gather for Christmas dinner, some will stick to formal traditions dating back to Grandma’s generation. Their tables will be set with the good dishes and silver, and the dress code will be Sunday-best。
But in many other homes, this china-and-silver elegance has given way to a stoneware-and-stainless informality, with dresses assuming an equally casual-Friday look. For hosts and guests, the change means greater simplicity and comfort. For makers of fine china in Britain, it spells economic hard times。
Last week Royal Doulton, the largest employer in Stoke-on-Trent, announced that it is eliminating 1,000 jobs—one—fifth of its total workforce. That brings to more than 4,000 the number of positions lost in 18 months in the pottery (陶瓷) region. Wedgwood and other pottery factories made cuts earlier。
Although a strong pound and weak markets in Asia play a role in the downsizing, the layoffs in Stoke have their roots in earthshaking social shifts. A spokesman for Royal Doulton admitted that the company “has been somewhat slow in catching up with the trend” toward casual dining. Families eat together less often, he explained, and more people eat alone, either because they are single or they eat in front of television。
Even dinner parties, if they happen at all, have gone casual. In a time of long work hours and demanding family schedules, busy hosts insist, rightly, that it’s better to share a takeout pizza on paper plates in the family room than to wait for the perfect moment or a “real” dinner party. Too often, the perfect moment never comes. Iron a fine-patterned tablecloth? Forget it. Polish the silver? Who has time?
Yet the loss of formality has its down side. The fine points of etiquette (礼节) that children might once have learned at the table by observation or instruction from parents and grandparents (“Chew with your mouth closed” “Keep your elbows off the table”) must be picked up elsewhere. Some companies now offer etiquette seminars for employees who may be competent professionally but clueless socially。
26. The trend toward casual dining has resulted in
A. bankruptcy of fine china manufacturers。
B. shrinking of the pottery industry。
C. restructuring of large enterprises。
D. economic recession in Great Britain。
27. Which of the following may be the best reason for casual dining?
A. Family members need more time to relax。
B. Busy schedules leave people no time for formality。
C. People want to practice economy in times of scarcity。
D. Young people won’t follow the etiquette of the older generation。
28. It can be learned from the passage that Royal Doulton is
A. a retailer of stainless steel tableware。
B. a dealer in stoneware。
C. a pottery chain store。
D. a producer of fine china。
29. The main cause of the layoffs in the pottery industry is
A. the increased value of the pound。
B. the economic recession in Asia。
C. the change in people’s way of life。
D. the fierce competition at home and abroad。
30. Refined table manners, though less popular than before in current social life,
A. are still a must on certain occasions。
B. are bound to return sooner or later。
C. are still being taught by parents at home。
D. can help improve personal relationships。
Passage Three
On average, American kids aged 3 to 12 spent 29 hours a week in school, eight hours more than they did in 1981. They also did more household work and participated in more of such organized activities as soccer and ballet. Involvement in sports, in particular, rose almost 50% from 1981 to 1997: boys now spend an average of four hours a week playing sports; girls log half that time. All in all, however, children’s leisure time dropped from 40% of the day in 1981 to 25%。
“Children are affected by the same time crunch that affects their parents,” says Sandra Hofferth, who headed the recent study of children’s timetable. A chief reason, she says, is that more mothers are working outside the home. (Nevertheless, children in both double-income and “male breadwinner” households spent comparable amounts of time interacting with their parents, 19 hours and 22 hours respectively. In contrast, children spent only 9 hours with their single mothers。)
All work and no play could make for some very messed-up kids. “Play is the most powerful way a child explores the world and learns about himself,” says T. Berry Brazelton, professor at Harvard Medical School. Unstructured play encourages independent thinking and allows the young to negotiate their relationships with their peers, but kids aged 3 to 12 spent only 12 hours a week engaged in it。
The children sampled spent a quarter of their rapidly decreasing “free time” watching television. But that, believe it or not, was one of the findings parents might regard as good news. If they’re spending less time in front of the TV set, however, kids aren’t replacing it with reading. Despite efforts to get kids more interested in books, the children spent just over an hour a week reading. Let’s face it, who’s got the time?
31. By mentioning “the same time crunch” (Para. 2) Sandra Hofferth means
A. children have little time to play with their parents。
B. children are not taken good care of by their working parents。
C. both parents and children suffer from lack of leisure time。
D. both parents and children have trouble managing their time。
32. According to the author, the reason given by Sandra Hofferth for the time crunch is
A. quite convincing。
B. partially true。
C. totally groundless。
D. rather confusing。
|
|