考研论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 100|回复: 0

何凯文每日一句:2019考研英语第76句

[复制链接]

2万

主题

2万

帖子

8万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
87561
发表于 2018-6-8 21:59:58 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
2019何凯文每日一句会一如既往陪伴大家。针对考研英语复习,文都考研小编也会及时整理推送相关内容。以下是第76句。每一场考研路都有成败,希望考生们能不忘初心,坚持当初决定考研的信仰,何凯文每日一句希望能到大家。
今天的句子:
Just because you can land fancy jobs doesn’t change basic things you lack that well-off peers take for granted. Think: money for apartment security deposits and work wardrobes. There’s no access to professional networks and little advice to weigh career options.
思考题一:
The low-income students have no access to the fancy jobs due to lack of money.
思考题二:
The fundamental difference between first generation graduates and their rich peers still exists.
第一句:
Just because you can land fancy jobs doesn’t change basic things you lack that well-off peers take for granted.
词汇突破:
1.land fancy jobs:找到好工作
2. well-off peers:家境优渥的同龄人
3. take sth for granted:认为某事是理所当然的
切分:
1.Just because you can land fancy jobs(because引导的主语从句) doesn’t change basic things
2. (that)you lack
3. that well-off peers take for granted.
仅仅因为你们能找到很好工作并不能改变一些基本的事情。这些东西是你们没有的也是那些出生优渥的同龄人认为理所当然的。
第二句:
Think: money for apartment security deposits and work wardrobes.
词汇突破:
1. apartment security deposits 公寓保证押金
2. wardrobes 衣橱,衣柜
参考译文:
比如:用于交公寓保证押金和买职业装的钱。
第三句:
There’s no access to professional networks and little advice to weigh career options.
词汇突破:
1. access 入口,途径
2. professional networks 职业人际圈
3.weigh 考虑,考量
参考译文:没有职业人际圈的入口,没有权衡职业选择的建议。
后续:
文章中谈到了一个名校的毕业生Asbury, 她的情况就是:Asbury didn’t know what to make of her first job contract.(她不知道如何签订自己的第一份工作合同。)
“I can’t go to my mom, who earned $25K and no benefits, and figure out if this is a good offer,” she says. (我不可能去问我妈妈让她告诉我这个工作是不是份好工作啊,她一年的薪水只有2万5千元而且没有福利。)
思考题一:
The low-income students have no access to the fancy jobs due to lack of money.
所以这个表达是错误的。因为文章说的是这些找到好工作的低收入毕业生没有职业人脉圈。而不是因为没钱而找不到好工作。
思考题二:
The fundamental difference between first generation graduates and their rich peers still exists.
first generation graduates 第一代大学毕业生=低收入家庭的毕业生
rich peers= well-off peers
fundamental=basic
根本的差异确实存在,所以这个表达是正确的。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|新都网

GMT+8, 2024-10-5 15:35 , Processed in 0.065390 second(s), 7 queries , WinCache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表