|
考研英语阅读理解是重头戏,分值大,比重高,考生在复习总也要多做练习,提高阅读速度和做题技巧。下面新东方在线小编份上2015考研英语阅读理解强化练习及解析希望考生先做练习后看解析,多思考总结,提高自己的阅读水平。》》点击查看:2015年考研英语复习指导专题
2015考研英语阅读理解强化练习及解析(19)
The world is goingthrough the biggest wave of mergers and acquisitions ever
witnessed. Theprocess sweeps from hyperactive America to Europe and reaches the
emergingcountries with unsurpassed might. Many in these countries are looking at
thisprocess and worrying: “Won't the wave of business concentration turn into an
uncontrollableanti-competitive force?"
There's no question that the big are getting bigger and morepowerful.
Multinational corporations accounted for less than 20% ofinternational trade in
1982. Today the figure is more than 25% and growingrapidly. International
affiliates account for a fast-growing segment ofproduction in economies that
open up and welcome foreign investment. InArgentina, for instance, after the
reforms of the early 1990s, multinationalswent from 43% to almost 70% of the
industrial production of the 200 largestfirms. This phenomenon has created
serious concerns over the role of smallereconomic firms, of national businessmen
and over the ultimate stability of theworld economy。
I believe that the most important forces behind the massive M&Awave are
the same that underlie the globalization process: fallingtransportation and
communication costs, lower trade and investment barriers andenlarged markets
that require enlarged operations capable of meeting customers'demands. All these
are beneficial, not detrimental, to consumers. Asproductivity grows, the world's
wealth increases。
Examples of benefits or costs of the current concentration wave arescanty.
Yet it is hard to imagine that the merger of a few oil firms todaycould
re-create the same threats to competition that were feared nearly acentury ago
in the U.S., when the Standard Oil trust was broken up. The mergersof telecom
companies, such as WorldCom, hardly seem to bring higher prices forconsumers or
a reduction in the pace of technical progress. On the contrary,the price of
communications is coming down fast. In cars, too, concentration
isincreasing—witness Daimler and Chrysler, Renault and Nissan—but it doesnot
appear that consumers are being hurt。
Yet the fact remains that the merger movement must be watched. Afew weeks
ago, Alan Greenspan warned against the megamergers in the bankingindustry. Who
is going to supervise, regulate and operate as lender of lastresort with the
gigantic banks that are being created? Won't multinationalsshift production from
one place to another when a nation gets too strict aboutinfringements to fair
competition? And should one country take upon itself therole of“defending
competition" on issues that affect many othernations, as in the U.S. vs.
Microsoft case?
33. What is the typical trend of businesses today?
[A]To take in more foreign funds
[B]To invest more abroad
[C]To combine and become bigger
[D]To trade with more countries
34. According to the author, one of the driving forces behindM&A wave
is _________。
[A]the greater customer demands
[B]a surplus supply for the market
[C]a growing productivity
[D]the increase of the world's wealth
35. From paragraph 4 we can infer that _________。
[A]the increasing concentration is certain to hurt consumers
[B]WorldCom serves as a good example of both benefits and costs
[C]the costs of the globalization process are enormous
[D]the Standard Oil trust might have threatened competition
36. Toward the new business wave, the writer's attitude can be saidto be
_________。
[A]optimistic
[B]objective
[C]pessimistic
[D]biased
|
|