考研阅读精选：修女与避孕

考研网

Nuns and contraception
Praying for the Pill
Dec 9th 2011, 14:48 by C.H. | NEW YORK

4037939039d84fec9885c0ba81a5844140.jpg

  THE Catholic church condemns all forms of contraception, a policy that  Paul VI laid out in detail in Humanae Vitae in 1968. Over the subsequent  decades it has had various brawls with secular authorities over the use  of birth control pills. Most recently, America’s bishops have fought to  keep Barack Obama’s health law from providing contraception free. The  church has already won an exemption for women who work for a church, but  it also wants to keep coverage from women who work for any Catholic  institution, even if the women in question are not Catholics and the  institution has a secular purpose, such as a school, say, or hospital.  Given all this, it would seem unlikely that the church would want to  give the Pill to its nuns.
Yet that is precisely what a recent paper  in the Lancet suggests. Its authors, Kara Britt and Roger Short, of  Monash University and the University of Melbourne, urge the Church to  provide oral contraception to the sisters. Nuns need the Pill not to  prevent pregnancy, but to prevent cancer.
In 1713, the  authors write, an Italian doctor observed that nuns had a very high rate  of that “accursed pest”, breast cancer. Modern studies have confirmed  that Catholic have a higher risk than most women of dying from breast,  ovarian and uterine cancers. Women who bear children have fewer  menstrual cycles, thanks to both pregnancy and lactation (which  suppresses menstruation). Other studies have established a relationship  between menstrual cycles and the prevalence of cancer, with fewer cycles  meaning a smaller risk. Nuns - who are required to be celibate -  experience more cycles than the typical woman, and therefore run a  higher risk of developing cancer.
The Pill can help to  counteract this. The overall mortality in women who use, or have used,  oral contraception, is 12% lower than among those who do not. The effect  on ovarian and endometrial cancer is greater: the risk of such cancers  plummets by about 50%. Drs Britt and Short make a compelling medical  case. But it is unlikely to sway the Church.