考研论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 54|回复: 0

考研阅读精选:设计与众不同

[复制链接]

33万

主题

33万

帖子

100万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
1007237
发表于 2017-8-5 22:02:47 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
『史蒂夫·乔布斯的真正才华在于他的设计,他用出色、整洁,友好的产品外观重塑了我们的世界。』

Design Different
设计与众不同

Oct 10th 2011 | from Newsweek

  When it came to design, Steve Jobs lived Apple’s “Think Different”  mantra. Many major corporations use design to benefit their bottom  lines, but Apple’s entire ethos was design. And it was hardwired in  Jobs. Even when he was heading NeXT, the educational-computer company he  founded, product and graphic design drove his strategy. He went so far  as to get special dispensation from IBM to commission the NeXT logo from  Paul Rand, designer of the IBM, ABC, and Westinghouse logos. When Jobs  returned to Apple, he took its design to new levels, profoundly  influencing the look of 21st-century computer technology.
   Apple products became designers’ best friends, forever altering the  practice of everything from graphic design to architecture by placing  production power in the hands of creators. Jobs realized that creative  people were not simply his primary customers, they were the willing  propagandists of the brand. He so keenly understood his end users, and  treated them with respect, that they went forth and exponentially  multiplied.
Jobs integrated a range of designers into all  aspects of the company—from hard- to software, from product to package,  from corporate identity to advertising. He found roles for graphic,  industrial, interior, and user-experience designers. But not as  stylists. Jobs never slavishly reacted to the market’s fickle whims or  wants; he accepted that his role was to educate people to the potential  of personal technology and enhance their appreciation of design. He used  design to alter behavior and consequently altered his users’ behavior  through innovative design.
Unlike many other tech companies,  design was the engine in Jobs’s world. Designers were not injected as  foreign organisms into the middle or end of the conceptual and  engineering process, after the engineers and marketers did the  meaningful work. Rather, designers were involved at the outset as equal  creative partners. Form did not follow function; it was an integral part  of the functional calculus. Jonathan Ive, Apple’s visionary product  designer, didn’t just make boxes in which circuit boards and chips were  tucked out of sight. He designed machines that were gateways to  satisfying, and often ecstatic, user experiences.
Jobs was an  equal-opportunity design patron. He never distinguished, as many brand  conglomerates do, between high and low design for high-end and low-end  markets. One brand fit all. Apple did not hide a discount sub-brand  behind tasteless graphics—although fair discounts offered to educators  and some professions were routinely available. Every customer got the  same logo, package, and product. Design was not used to mask shoddy  goods or inflate prices. Jobs’s sense of quality was legend. He  instilled his designers with extra pride. Likewise it was expected that  every Apple customer would experience pride of ownership. From the boxes  in which adapters and earbuds were sold to the look of the apps that  are now so ubiquitous, the end user expected the best, the clearest, the  cleanest.
And what about those Apple stores? Part museum, part retail mall—with great shopping bags, too.
  Rarely has design been so valued by a corporate CEO, and rarely is  design’s value so inextricably tied to the reputation of a corporation.  Jobs was a holistic designer—everything, everywhere, was designed well.  And that is the essence of thinking different. (653 words)
文章地址:http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/10/09/design-different.html
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|新都网

GMT+8, 2025-11-12 04:05 , Processed in 0.047659 second(s), 8 queries , WinCache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表