2018考研英语双语阅读：让人无语的高考阅读题

考研网

　　2018考研复习进行时，考研英语阅读真题中的文章，多摘自英美主流外刊，有时候你认识所有单词、搞清全部语法还不够，还需要了解英美文化，掌握他们的表达方式，这就是阅读的潜台词。下面新东方网考研频道考研整理《2018考研英语双语阅读精选》，速来学习吧！
       
        　　Reading test of entrance exam sparks hot debate
        　　最让人无语的高考阅读题：十二年寒窗输给一条草鱼!
        　　A conundrum of Chinese language reading test in the latest National College
Entrance Examination or Gaokao in Zhejiang province has confused many students
as well as the author of the text.
        　　在最近的高考中，浙江省语文试卷出了一道很难的阅读题，不但考生一头雾水，就连文章原作者也表示无语。
        　　The test required students to choose the most accurate and appropriate
analysis among the choices to explain why the author ended the story with a
sentence stating that "the eyes of the fish flash with a glimpse of
weirdness."
        　　试卷要求考生选择准确恰当地分析，为什么作者以“那条鱼的眼中泛着诡异的光”这句话为文章结尾。
        　　In his Weibo (China’s equivalent to Twitter), Gong Gaofeng, author of the
article selected for the test, wrote that he was no different than the students
sitting the exam in being perplexed by the analytical choices on offer.
        　　在新浪微博上，原文作者龚高峰表示，他跟高考考生们一样，对这道分析题也是一头雾水。
        　　Gong is not the first author confused by the test of his own material. In
2011, a reading test in Fujian province asked the students to explain why the
author twice described pelting rain in the article. However, the writer later
told the media that it was simply because he had been writing the article while
it was raining.
        　　然而龚高峰并不是第一个答不出自己文章题目的原文作者。2011年，福建高考卷要求考生解释为什么作者两次在文中描写暴雨。然而，原文作者随后告诉媒体称，原因仅仅是因为他写文章的时候就在下雨。
        　　Although the entrance exam finished a few days ago, the debate on whether
the reading analysis should go beyond an author’s true intentions continues.
        　　虽然高考前几天就结束了，但是关于阅读分析题是否应该超出原文作者本意的争论仍在持续。
        　　According to Gong, the final part of his story about the eyes of the fish
was intended to salute to the style of the writer O Henry who often concluded
his novels with mysterious or unexpected ending.
        　　据龚高峰表示，他文章最后关于鱼眼的那部分是为了向欧亨利致敬，后者的小说常常有出人意料或者神秘的结局。
        　　Yu Yonggang, director of Chinese language pedagogic team from Ningbo
Chaiqiao High School, said, "The design of the particular multiple choice did
not digress from the scope of required knowledge, as O Henry’s endings are
encompassed in the compulsory textbooks, while, the mysterious writing is one of
the genre compiled in elective courses."
        　　据宁波柴桥高中语文教师队伍主任余永刚(音)表示：“这道多选题的设置并没有超纲，因为欧亨利的文章结尾是教材必修内容，而这种神秘流派的写作方法在选修教材中也有介绍。”
        　　The excerpt from the novel chosen for the exam reflects the impoverished
life in the past, which may, however, fail to resonate with the generation born
after 2000, so that’s why the question sounds difficult, he added.
        　　他还说道，在试卷中，这部小说的节选部分反映了过去的贫穷生活，但这可能难以和00后学生产生共鸣，因此这就是为什么这道题很难的原因。
       
[img][/img]