|
|
2017考研初试12月24日至26日进行，新东方网考研频道时刻关注2017考研初试情况(点击查看》》2017考研初试真题及答案解析专题)，并第一时间为考生提供考研真题答案及答案解析内容，同时新东方考研名师将为考生提供视频直播解析。敬请关注新东方网考研频道为您带来的精彩内容。名师解析专区|考研真题答案专区|考研历年真题
英语二阅读文章源文
源于The Christian Science Monitor July 1, 2016
230_161224171951owM4sUyv5cYv1uSJ51.png
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2016/0701/As-wildfires-challenge-California-the-causes-go-beyond-climate
As wildfires challenge California, the causes go beyond climate
A shift in thought
Wildfire season has become longer and more intense lately. But beyond
addressing climate change, some researchers call for a paradigm shift to address
the various human factors relating to prevention and safety.
By Jessica Mendoza, Staff writer July 1, 2016
Azusa, Calif. — On a chain-link fence along Route 39 hangs a homemade
poster, peppered with hearts, thanking firefighters and police.
The sign, one of a handful scattered across town, salutes efforts to battle
the San Gabriel Complex fire, twin blazes that had erupted on June 20 in the
mountains of Angeles National Forest just to the north of the city. Within a day
of igniting, the fire had burned through nearly 5,000 acres and forced hundreds
to evacuate.
Nearly a week passed before the US Forest Service and local and state
authorities managed to contain even half of the inferno.
Recommended: Could you be a Hotshot? Take our quiz!
“Three days in, you could still see the flames,” says Jasmine Perez, a
teacher’s assistant and resident of Azusa, which sits northeast of Los Angeles.
And because of the smoke, she adds, “In the mornings, it kind of looked like
nighttime still.”
The San Gabriel Complex was one of 12 large fires that about 4,000
firefighters were battling across California as of Thursday. Such numbers so
early in the fire season are a testament to the growing frequency and intensity
of wildfires in the western US, fire officials say – a shift that many experts
say is likely intertwined with climate change and its associated consequences,
such as drought.
But climate, however critical, is only part of the problem, scientists say.
A growing body of evidence suggests that other human activity and policy have at
least as much impact on wildfires as climate change. To effectively address a
longer and more intense wildfire season – and ensure the safety of residents in
fire-prone areas – both environmental and human factors have to be taken into
account in more holistic ways, they say.
That means more than just sweeping dry brush off the front porch. Though
such steps are an important part of the process, officials and researchers alike
are calling for a comprehensive approach to wildfires: one that incorporates
fire safety and behavior in key policy decisions and legislation. Such an effort
would also recognize that fire can be helpful as well as harmful and embrace
fire’s place in human society.
“We need not just a policy shift but also a cultural shift in the dialogue
around fires in our landscape and how to manage them,” says Jennifer Balch,
director of Earth Lab and a professor of geography at the University of Colorado
in Boulder. “Fire is not something we can remove. A large majority of the
country is living in fire-prone areas. How do we live with wildfire? How do we
manage?”
“More and more researchers are arguing that anthropogenic influences are
really important [to understanding wildfires],” adds Max Moritz, a specialist in
fire ecology and management and a professor at the College of Natural Resources
at the University of California, Berkeley. “By leaving them out we’re missing a
critical piece of the solution.”
Changing attitudes on fire
选取部分：
Though often viewed as a problem for western states, the growing frequency
of wildfires is a national concern because of its impact on federal tax dollars,
Professor Moritz and others say.
In 2015, the US Forest Service for the first time spent more than half of its $5.5 billion annual budget fighting fires – nearly double the percentage it
spent on such efforts 20 years ago. In effect, fewer federal funds today are
going towards the agency’s other work – such as forest conservation, watershed
and cultural resources management, and infrastructure upkeep – that affect the
lives of all Americans.
Another nationwide concern is whether public funds from other agencies,
such as the Department of Housing and Urban Development, are going into
construction in fire-prone districts. As Moritz puts it, how often are federal
dollars building homes that are likely to be lost to a wildfire?
“It’s already a huge problem from a public expenditure perspective for the
whole country,” he says. “We need to take a magnifying glass to that. Like,
‘Wait a minute, is this OK?’ Do we want instead to redirect those funds to
concentrate on lower-hazard parts of the landscape?”
Such a pivot would require a corresponding shift in the way US society
today views fire, researchers say.
For one thing, conversations about wildfires need to be more inclusive.
Over the past decade, the focus has been on climate change – how the warming of
the Earth from greenhouse gases (including human carbon emissions) is leading to
conditions that exacerbate fires.
While climate is a key element, Moritz says, it shouldn’t come at the
expense of the rest of the equation.
“The human systems and the landscapes we live on are linked, and the
interactions go both ways,” he says. Failing to recognize that, he notes, leads
to “an overly simplified view of what the solutions might be. Our perception of
the problem and perception of what the solution is [becomes] very limited.”
At the same time, people continue to treat fire as an event that needs to
be wholly controlled and unleashed only out of necessity, says Professor Balch
at the University of Colorado. But acknowledging fire’s inevitable presence in
human life is an attitude crucial to developing the laws, policies, and
practices that make it as safe as possible, she says.
“We’ve disconnected ourselves from living with fire,” Balch says. “It is
really important to understand and try and tease out what is the human
connection [with fire] today.”
Role for citizens ... and for policy
After nearly 30 years in the state fire service, Janet Upton understands
the value of that connection.
During her early days with the California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection (Cal Fire), veterans would tell war stories of huge fires that
happened once in a career, she recalls.
“But in my generation, those of us who’ve come up through the '80s, '90s,
2000s … we feel like we don’t have the license to use the word ‘unprecedented’
any more. We’ve seen it all in the last few years,” she says. “I’ve probably had
15 once-in-a-career fires.”
And people caused most of them, Ms. Upton says. About 90 percent of all
fires in California can be traced to human activity, whether it’s a stove left
on or a campfire left burning. Which is why public education has been Upton’s
main goal since 2008, when then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed her Cal
Fire’s deputy communications director.
The department has since made strides, playing a major role in launching
state and nationalcampaigns that underscore the public’s role in fire safety.
But people’s tendency to put danger out of their minds until it’s too late
continues to pose serious challenges, Upton says.
“This is going to sound cold. But if someone chooses to live in a rural
area and continues to not be responsive to [fire-safety] education, sadly, the
worst punishment they’re going to get is they’re going to lose their home in a
fire,” she says.
A paradigm shift, some researchers hope, can address that gap between
education and action. Environmental policy specialist Ray Rasker, for instance,
envisions whole communities designed around the concept of fire safety, and a
slate of fire-prevention policies at the local, state, and national level.
“What we’re telling the public now is, ‘Reduce the risk of fires – if you
so choose.’ Imagine if we tried driving our cars like that,” says Dr. Rasker,
who is also executive director of Headwaters Economics, a nonprofit research
firm based in Bozeman, Mont. “Why not use regulations, building codes, and
subdivision design standards, development codes and ordinances that say, ‘Look
if you’re going to build there, there are certain conditions you have to meet
first’?”
Some places are already taking steps. San Diego’s municipal code, for
instance, requires property owners to maintain landscape and vegetation
standards – or face a penalty equivalent to the cost of hiring a private
contractor to do so. Austin, Texas, has set aside close to 30 percent of city
land as conservation areas, curbing the number of new structures that can be
built within the fire-prone “wildland-urban interface” (WUI) – the space between
unoccupied natural land and human developments. Flagstaff, Ariz., Boulder,
Colo., and Santa Fe, N.M., have all enacted similar policies.
But the need for action continues to grow. As bad as wildfires have been in
recent years, research shows they’re likely to get worse as the US population
increases and people build more homes in the WUI, more than 80 percent of which
remain undeveloped.
“We keep building more and more homes in harm’s way,” Rasker notes. “Unless
we get a handle on development, we’re really not addressing the problem.”
Mind-set matters, too – for everyone, says Upton at Cal Fire.
“It’s a mitigation issue. You can take the lens we’re looking at [in
California] and take it to Tornado Alley or the Eastern Seaboard,” she says. In
the end, “it’s about informing yourself as a member of the public or a
policymaker. How can you do something comprehensive?”
考后关注》》
考研复试科普：复试都考什么？
关于考研分数线你必须知道的事
大学寒假进修指南》》
124_161208102329Hk7EoTkybIpc6VlB51.png
更多知识点请关注新东方网考研公众账号》》kaoyanxdf |
|
发表于 2016-12-24 19:53:07