2015考研英语阅读理解强化练习及解析（4）
考研英语阅读理解是重头戏，分值大，比重高，考生在复习总也要多做练习，提高阅读速度和做题技巧。下面新东方在线小编份上2015考研英语阅读理解强化练习及解析希望考生先做练习后看解析，多思考总结，提高自己的阅读水平。》》点击查看：2015年考研英语复习指导专题2015考研英语阅读理解强化练习及解析（4）
Do you rememberall those years when scientists argued that smoking would
kill us but thedoubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure? That the evidence
was inconclusive, the scienceuncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to
destroy our way of life andthe government should stay out of the way? Lots of
Americans bought thatnonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers
went to early graves。
There are upsetting parallels today, as scientists in one waveafter another
try to awaken us to the growing threat of global warming. Thelatest was a panel
from the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the WhiteHouse, to tell us
that the Earth’s atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is
largelyman-made. The clear message is that we should get moving to protest
ourselves.The president of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added this key
point inthe preface to the panel’s report: “Science never has all the answers。”
But science doesprovide us with the best available guide to the future, and it
is critical thatour nation and the world base important policies on the best
judgments thatscience can provide concerning the future consequences of present
actions。
Just as on smoking, voices now come from many quarters insistingthat the
science about global warming is incomplete, that it’s OK to keeppouring fumes
into the air until we know for sure. This is a dangerous game: bythe time 100
percent of the evidence is in, it may be too late. With the risksobvious and
growing, a prudent people would take out an insurance policy now。
Fortunately, the White House is starting to pay attention. But it’s
obviousthat a majority of the president’s advisers still don’t take global
warming seriously. Instead of a plan of action, theycontinue to press for more
research—a classic case of “paralysis byanalysis。”
To serve as responsible stewards of the planet, we must pressforward on
deeper atmospheric and oceanic research. But research alone isinadequate. If the
Administration won’t take thelegislative initiative, Congress should help to
begin fashioning conservationmeasures. A bill by Democratic Senator Robert Byrd
of West Virginia, whichwould offer financial incentives for private industry, is
a promising start.Many see that the country is getting ready to build lots of
new power plants tomeet our energy needs. If we are ever going to protect the
atmosphere, it iscrucial that those new plants be environmentally sound。
26. An argument made by supporters of smoking was that
there was no scientific evidence of the correlation betweensmoking and
death。
the number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades
wasinsignificant。
people had the freedom to choose their own way of life。
antismoking people were usually talking nonsense。
27. According to Bruce Alberts, science can serve as
a protector。
a judge。
a critic。
a guide。
28. What does the author mean by “paralysis byanalysis” (Last line,
Paragraph 4)?
Endless studies kill action。
Careful investigation reveals truth。
Prudent planning hinders progress。
Extensive research helps decision-making。
29. According to the author, what should the Administration doabout global
warming?
Offer aid to build cleaner power plants。
Raise public awareness of conservation。
Press for further scientific research。
Take some legislative measures。
30. The author associates the issue of global warming with that ofsmoking
because
they both suffered from the government’s negligence。
a lesson from the latter is applicable to the former。
the outcome of the latter aggravates the former。
both of them have turned from bad to worse。
解析
26. An argument made by supporters of smoking was that
吸烟的支持者提出的观点是
there was no scientific evidence of the correlation betweensmoking and
death。
没有科学证据证明吸烟和死亡之间存在相互联系。
the number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades
wasinsignificant。
在过去的几十年中过早死亡的吸烟者人数不多。
people had the freedom to choose their own way of life。
人们有选择自己生活方式的自由。
antismoking people were usually talking nonsense。
反对吸烟的人通常一派胡言。
【答案】 C
【考点】 事实细节题。
【分析】
从第一段可以看出，其实支持吸烟的人的理由不止一个，比如证据不够充分，科学也不能确定，反对吸烟的游说是为了毁掉我们的生活方式等等。选项是出题人故意扩大范围，夸大选项，故意绝对化，原文只是证据不足，而不是没有证据。选项说死亡人数不多，而原文提到的“1,000万”可不是小数字。选项不符合的原因是作者说支持吸烟的人的话是“nonsense”(一派胡言)，而不是反对吸烟的人的话。
27. According to Bruce Alberts, science can serve as
根据布鲁斯·阿尔伯特的观点，科学能充当
a protector. 保护人。
a judge. 评判人、法官。
a critic. 批评者。
a guide. 向导。
【答案】 D
【考点】 事实细节题。
【分析】 文章第二段第四句中有这样的话“科学从来都不能够提供所有的答案，但是科学却能够为我们提供通向未来的最佳引导”。
28. What does the author mean by “paralysis byanalysis” (Last line,
Paragraph 4)?
作者通过“分析性瘫痪症”(第四段最后一行)表达什么意思?
Endless studies kill action. 无穷尽的研究遏制了行动。
Careful investigation reveals truth. 详细的研究揭示了真理。
Prudent planning hinders. 谨慎的计划阻碍了进展。
Extensive research helps decision-making. 广泛的研究帮助决策。
【答案】 A
【考点】 上下文暗示题。
【分析】
文章第四段说“白宫已经开始关注此事，但是总统顾问中的许多人仍然没有认真对待地球变暖问题，他们不但没有制定行动计划，反而继续要求进行更多的研究——这是典型的‘分析性麻痹症’”。也就是总统顾问中的许多人通过分析、研究来拖延行动。所以这里应该选择。
29. According to the author, what should the Administration doabout global
warming?
根据本文作者的看法，政府对全球变暖应该做些什么?
Offer aid to build cleaner power plants. 提供帮助，建造更加清洁的电厂。
Raise public awareness of conservation. 提高公众的环保意识。
Press for further scientific research. 敦促更进一步的科学研究。
Take some legislative measures. 采取一些立法的措施。
【答案】 D
【考点】 推断题。
【分析】
文章的最后一段里面提到“只有研究是不够的，如果政府不采取法律行动，国会应该开始制定保护措施。”选项很具有干扰性，因为原文中出现了“电厂”的概念，这是出题人根据文章最后两句话“很多人看见国家正在做好准备来修建大量的电厂来满足我们的能源需求。但是如果我们要保护我们的大气，这些电厂必须是环保的。”来编写的干扰项，采取环保措施是“国会”(congress)做的。选项说政府应该提高公众的环保意识，这一点文章没有提到。选项是显然不对的，因为上文刚说光有研究是不够的。只有选项采取立法措施是“政府”(administration)应该做的。
30. The author associates the issue of global warming with that ofsmoking
because
作者把全球变暖和吸烟联系在一起是因为
they both suffered from the government’s negligence。
它们二者都被政府忽视。
a lesson from the latter is applicable to the former。
从后者吸取的教训适用于前者。
the outcome of the latter aggravates the former。
后者的结果恶化了前者。
both of them have turned from bad to worse。
它们二者都已经日益恶化。
【答案】 B
【考点】 推断题。
【分析】
本题出题思路是考生能否把握住作者将吸烟和全球变暖问题联系在一起的意图。在第一段，作者提到“几十年前吸烟问题被忽视带来严重后果;而现在这样的忽视又发生在全球变暖问题上，希望政府引以为鉴，吸取教训”。选项不合适的原因是它只指出一个事实，却没有能够指出作者联系二者的意图。选项说吸烟的后果恶化了全球变暖，显然是不对的。选项说二者都已经日益恶化，显然也没有能够反映作者意图。只有选项正确，它明确指出了政府应该从后者的教训中引以为鉴。
页:
[1]