| 
 | 
 
When school officials in Kalkaska, Michigan, closed classes last week, the  
media flocked to the story, portraying the town's 2,305 students as victims of  
stingy (吝啬的) taxpayers. There is some truth to that; the property-tax rate here  
is one-third lower than the state average. But shutting their schools also  
allowed Kalkaska's educators and the state's largest teachers' union, the  
Michigan Education Association, to make a political point. Their aim was to spur  
passage of legislation Michigan lawmakers are debating to increase the state's  
share of school funding. 
    It was no coincidence that Kalkaska shut its schools two weeks after  
residents rejected a 28 percent property-tax increase. The school board argued  
that without the increase it lacked the $1.5 million needed to keep schools  
open. 
    But the school system had not done all it could to keep the schools open.  
Officials declined to borrow against next year's state aid, they refused to trim  
extracurricular activities and they did not consider seeking a smaller—perhaps  
more acceptable—tax increase. In fact, closing early is costing Kalkaska a  
significant amount, including $ 600,000 in unemployment payments to teachers and  
staff and $ 250,000 in lost state aid. In February, the school system promised  
teachers and staff two months of retirement payments in case schools closed  
early, a deal that will cost the district $ 275,000 more. 
     
                     |   
 
 
 
 |