考研网 发表于 2018-2-2 22:02:11

2015考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第3篇

英语阅读是考研英语必考的一部分内容也是分值占比较高的一部分知识点。2018考研同学复习的重点,距离18年考研时间仅剩两个多月的时间,各科的复习都紧张进行着。跨考网考研小编为大家整理了2015考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第3篇,希望同学们能够对英语阅读真题进行研究,对真题的出题方向、考察方式有进一步的掌握,争取取得好成绩。  The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today.
  The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.
  "Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal," writes McNutt in an editorial.
  Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE).
  Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal's internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers.
  The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.
  Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said:
  "The creation of the 'statistics board' was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science's overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish."
  Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group.
  He says he expects the board to "play primarily an advisory role."
  He agreed to join because he "found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact.
  This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science."
  John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is "a most welcome step forward" and "long overdue."
  "Most journals are weak in statistical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish.
  I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review," he says.
  But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.
  Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist.
  Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, "engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process".
  Vaux says that Science's idea to pass some papers to statisticians "has some merit,
  but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify 'the papers that need scrutiny' in the first place".
  总主编马西娅·麦克娜特今天宣布:《科学》杂志在同行评阅之外又增加一轮数据审查。
  数据分析中出现的基本错误致使许多出版的研究发现不可再生得到广泛关注后,《科学》也随即效仿了其他杂志的做法。
  “一定要让读者对我们出版的研究结论有信心,”麦克娜特在一篇专栏中写道。
  该杂志与美国统计协会一道,任命七名专家成立了一个数据校对编辑委员会。
  原稿将由杂志内部编辑,或已经成立的数据校对编辑委员会委员或外部同行校对员标注以供进一步的审查。
  届时该委员会成员将物色外部统计专家来审查这些原稿。
  在被问及是否已有特殊的论文促成了这样的改变时,麦克娜特说:
  “对科学研究领域的统计学应用和数据分析的广泛关注,促使了‘数据校对编辑委员会的成立’,该委员会成立也是全面提高我们出版的研究可再生性努力的一部分。”
  乔瓦尼·帕尔米贾尼是哈佛大学公共卫生学院的生物统计学家、该委员会的成员。
  他说他期望该委员会“能扮演最基本的顾问角色”。
  他同意加入是因为“他发现建立该委员会的眼光很新颖、独特,还可能会有持久的影响力。”
  它影响到的不仅是《科学》杂志本身,而且可能影响到更多想要在《科学》杂志之后成为行业模范的出版社。
  约翰·伊奥尼迪斯,一名专攻研究方法论的物理学家,称这一政策是“最受欢迎的进步”却又“姗姗来迟。”
  “数据审查是大多数杂志的薄弱环节,而这会损害出版物的质量。
  我认为,对于当今大多数的科学论文来说,数据审查比专家审查更为重要,”他说道。
  他曾指出,生物医学杂志如《内科医学年鉴》《美国医学会杂志》和《柳叶刀》都非常注重数据审查。
  细胞生物学家大卫·沃克斯称:“人们认为职业科学家应该懂得如何进行数据分析,但是已出版的研究中的数据错误却极其普遍。”
  他2012年在《自然》杂志中写到,研究者应提高他们的专业水准,而杂志更要不甘示弱,“聘用通晓统计的校对员和能核实数据的编辑”。
  沃克斯表示,《科学》杂志将论文交给统计学家审查的想法有其可取之处,
  但它的不足是依赖委员会的审查编辑先识别出‘需要审查的论文’。
  重点单词
  additional[ə'diʃənl]adj. 附加的,另外的
  overdue['əuvə'dju:]adj. 过期的,未兑的,迟到的
  overall[əuvə'rɔ:l]adj. 全部的,全体的,一切在内的
  widespread['waidspred]adj. 分布(或散布)广的,普遍的
  manuscript['mænjuskript]adj. 手抄的
  n. 手稿,原稿联想记忆
  verify['verifai]vt. 查证,核实
  methodology[.meθə'dɔlədʒi]n. 一套方法,方法学
  internaladj. 国内的,内在的,身体内部的
  association[ə.səusi'eiʃən]n. 联合,结合,交往,协会,社团,联想
  celln. 细胞,电池,小组,小房间,单人牢房,(蜂房的)巢室
       小编说:时间从来都是很快的流逝,尤其是对于忙碌的人,今天的你如果感觉天黑来的很快,那么请庆幸你的忙碌,这样的忙碌带来不仅是成绩的提升,还同时在提升你的个人能力,让你在将来比其他人更快的步入财务相对自由的状态,高学历不仅是成绩的印证,更是能力的代表!!改变,就从你加入秋季集训营开始!
2018考研大纲发布 新增考点名师解读   

   
    秋季提升需注意
   
   
    重点关注
    金九银十 精准择校
    读懂院校招简,复习不跑偏
   
   
    考研报名流程注意事项全解析
    考研名师带着走 视频免费666
   
   
    2018考研知识“秋季提升”大作战
    不得不知的考研大纲解读
    2018年考研报名注意事项问答专栏
   
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 2015考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第3篇