2015考研英语阅读理解强化练习及解析（2）
考研英语阅读理解是重头戏，分值大，比重高，考生在复习总也要多做练习，提高阅读速度和做题技巧。下面新东方在线小编份上2015考研英语阅读理解强化练习及解析希望考生先做练习后看解析，多思考总结，提高自己的阅读水平。》》点击查看：2015年考研英语复习指导专题2015考研英语阅读理解强化练习及解析（2）
Americans no longerexpect public figures, whether in speech or in writing,
to command the Englishlanguage with skill and gift. Nor do they aspire to such
command themselves. Inhis latest book, Doing Our Own Thing: The Degradation of
Language and Why We Should,Like, Care, John McWhorter, a linguist and
controversialist of mixed liberaland conservative views, sees the triumph of
1960s counter-culture asresponsible for the decline of formal English。
Blaming the permissive 1960s is nothing new, but this is not yetanother
criticism against the decline in education. Mr. McWhorter’s academicspecialty is
language history and change, and he sees the gradual disappearanceof “whom”， for
example, to be natural and no more regrettable than the loss ofthe case-endings
of Old English。
But the cult of the authentic and the personal, “doing ourown thing”， has
spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music.While even the
modestly educated sought an elevated tone when they put pen topaper before the
1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then hassought to capture
spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highlypersonal, performative
genre is the only form that could claim real liveliness.In both oral and written
English, talking is triumphing over speaking,spontaneity over craft。
Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both highand low
culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But itis less
clear, to take the question of his subtitle, why we should, like, care.As a
linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language,
includingnon-standard ones like Black English, can be powerfully
expressive—there existsno language or dialect in the world that cannot convey
complex ideas. He is notarguing, as many do, that we can no longer think
straight because we do nottalk proper。
Russians have a deep love for their own language and carry largechunks of
memorized poetry in their heads, while Italian politicians tend toelaborate
speech that would seem old-fashioned to most English speakers. Mr.McWhorter
acknowledges that formal language is not strictly necessary, andproposes no
radical education reforms—he is reallygrieving over the loss of something
beautiful more than useful. We now take ourEnglish “on paper plates instead of
china”. A shame, perhaps,but probably an inevitable one。
36. According to McWhorter, the decline of formal English
is inevitable in radical education reforms。
is but all too natural in language development。
has caused the controversy over the counter-culture。
brought about changes in public attitudes in the 1960s。
37. The word “talking” (Line 5, Paragraph 3) denotes
modesty.
personality.
liveliness.
informality。
38. To which of the following statements would McWhorter mostlikely
agree?
Logical thinking is not necessarily related to the way we talk。
Black English can be more expressive than standard English。
Non-standard varieties of human language are just asentertaining。
Of all the varieties, standard English can best convey
complexideas。
39. The description of Russians’ love of memorizingpoetry shows the
author’s
interest in their language.
appreciation of their efforts。
admiration for their memory.
contempt for their old-fashionedness。
40. According to the last paragraph, “paper plates” is to “china” as
“temporary” is to “permanent”。
“radical ”is to “conservative”。
“functional ” is to “artistic”。
“humble” is to “noble”。
解析
36. According to Mc Whorter, the decline of formal English
根据麦克沃特所言， 正式英语的衰退
is inevitable in radical education reforms. 在激进的教育改革中是不可避免的。
is but all too natural in language development. 在语言的发展中实属自然。
has caused the controversy over the counter-culture. 造成了对反文化潮流的争议。
brought about changes in public attitudes in the 1960s.
带来了20世纪60年代公众态度的变化。
【答案】 B
【考点】 事实细节题。
【分析】 第二段的第二句中作者提到麦克沃特，诸如“he sees gradual disappearance of ‘whom’,
forexample, to be natural and no more regrettable than the loss of
thecase-endings of Old
English，”就是要求考生能够理解出正式英语在语言发展中衰退的自然性。选项中提到的激进的教育在文章的最后一段中可以找到“Mr. McWhorter
acknowledges that formal language is not strictlynecessary, and proposes no
radical education reforms—he is reallygrieving over the loss of something
beautiful more than
useful。”这句话具有很强的干扰，主要是因为一些考生喜欢直接阅读，而不是先看题目，看到后面反而重点不够突出，似是而非。出题人常用的一个方法就是将一些文章中出现但是实际上没有必然联系的内容揉杂在一起，起到很大的干扰。其实文章中根本没有提到二者有什么关系，只是顺带说他没有提议用激进的教育来改变正式英语衰退的趋势。选项说对反文化有争议，从文中可以看出，将正式英语的衰退归咎于反文化并不会引起什么争议，没有人会认为反文化使得正式英语得到了发展。选项说正式英语的衰退导致公众态度的变化，这样的说法属于典型的因果倒置。出题人意图利用考生临场考试时不稳定的心理状态来干扰考生，看其能否正确理解文章的大意。如果考生不能够养成良好的考试习惯，往往会花费很多额外的时间，因为很多时候，我们只需要知道正确答案是什么，而无需知道也没有时间来分析其他选项错在哪里。
37. The word“talking”(Line 6, Paragraph3) denotes “talking”(第三段第六行)一词表示
modesty. 谦虚。
personality. 个性。
liveliness. 活泼。
informality. 非正式。
【答案】 D
【考点】 语义题。
【分析】
考生必须利用上下文推测单词意思，在原文中首先找到这句话，然后仔细研读，最后才能够体会出这个单词的意思。第三段首先提到“做我们自己的事情”的结果是规范的演讲、作品、诗歌和音乐的死亡。然后提到在20世纪60年代以前那些受过一般教育的人在写作时都用比较高雅的语气，最后又说那些被认为是最重要的作品都试图表现出口语的特色，“talking”战胜了演讲，即兴战胜了技巧。而口语化的特点就是非正式。
38. To which of the following statements would Mc Whorter mostlikely
agree?
下列哪一种说法麦克沃特最有可能会同意?
Logical thinking is not necessarily related to the way we talk。
逻辑思维并不必然与我们说话的方式相关。
Black English can be more expressive than standard English。
黑人所使用的英语可能比正式英语更有表现力。
Non-standard varieties of human language are just as entertaining。
人类的各种各样非标准的语言一样有趣。
Of all the varieties, standard English can best convey
complexideas。
在英语的各种变体中，标准英语最能表达复杂的思想。
【答案】 A
【考点】 推断题。
【分析】
在第四段第四句话中，我们可以看到，麦克沃特认为所有人类语言，包括黑人的非标准英语，都具有很强的表现力。选项中提到黑人使用的英语，但是说这种英语比正式英语更具有表现力是显然夸大了范围。选项认为正式英语最能够表达复杂的思想，也犯了同样的错误。紧接着作者提到麦克沃特不认为因为我们不能很好地说话我们就不能正确地进行思考。这句话正好应了选项，即正确的逻辑思维不一定与我们说话的方式有关。因此选项是正确的。的说法与原文完全不符合。
39. The description of Russians’ love of memorizingpoetry shows the
author’s
就俄罗斯人喜欢记忆诗歌的描述显示出作者
interest in their language. 对他们的语言感兴趣。
appreciation of their efforts. 欣赏他们的努力。
admiration for their memory. 对他们记忆力的仰慕。
contempt for their old-fashionedness. 对他们的守旧表示蔑视。
【答案】 B
【考点】 推断题。
【分析】
文章最后一段第一句话提到“俄罗斯人对本国语言的热爱，能够记得很多诗歌，而意大利的政治家们常常发表在大多数英国人看来有点过时的经过精心准备的演讲。麦克沃特认为正式语言并非不可或缺，也没有提出要进行激进的教育改革——他其实只是为那些美好而不是实用品的消逝而感到遗憾。”结合文章主题可以看出这几句话中作者的言下之意：他欣赏俄罗斯人为保持自身语言的优美性所做的努力。但是这并不能够说明他对俄罗斯语感兴趣，或者赞赏他们的记忆力，更不可能是轻视他们。
40. According to the last paragraph, “paper plates” is to “china” as
根据最后一段，将“纸盘子”和“瓷器”相比就相当于
“temporary”is to“permanent””. “暂时的”与“永久的”相比。
“radical”is to“conservative”. “激进的”与“保守的”相比。
“functional”is to“artistic”. “功能的”与“艺术的”相比。
“humble”is to“noble”. “谦卑的”与“高贵的”相比。
【答案】 C
【考点】 推断题。
【分析】
纸盘子和瓷盘子的区别不止一个，但是最后一段中作者提到优美和实用这层意思，也就是说作者想要说明的不是暂时与永久，不是激进与保守，不是谦卑与高贵，而是能够反映纸盘子和瓷盘子背后的优美和实用这一对概念，也就是功能与艺术的比较。
页:
[1]