2016考研英语阅读冲刺：“例证题”三大做题要点
考研英语阅读是整体试卷分数最重的部分，也是让很多考生很“忧愁”的题型之一。下面就为同学们总结一下阅读中例证题解题方法。一、判断题型
通过对考研英语阅读文章题干的观察分类例证题题干特点如下，当题干中出现example，demonstrate，illustrate，case，story，即可判断该题干为例证题，见历年真题题干如下：
1. Wilt Chamberlain is cited as an example to____.
2. George Washington's dental surgery in mentioned to____.
3. The birthday phenomenon found among soccer players is mentioned
to____.
4. The statement “It never rains but it pours” is used to
introduce____.
二、方法
通过对历年真题的分析，例证题的考察主要考察的是论点论据的区分，即找出例子论证的论点。例证题可细分为两种类型，例子在文首，例子在文中。例
子在文首时，多为了引出文章主题，主题通常紧随例子后面;例子在文中时，多为刚刚陈述一个观点，接着举例论证的情况，所以观点多数情况紧随例子前面。
例子在文首见历年真题题干如下：
1.The extinction of large prehistoric animals is noted to suggest
that________.
large animal were vulnerable to the changing environment
small species survived as large animals disappeared
large sea animals may face the same threat today
slow-growing fish outlive fast-growing ones
例子出现在文章首段，用过去式陈述过去发生在大型肉食动物身上的事情，一段末通过now这个时间指示副词和文章开头的arrived之间的对比，提出文章主题，Now
something similar could be happening in the oceans。正确答案为最后首段末句的同义替换，C。
2. The birthday phenomenon found among soccer players is mentioned
to____.
stress the importance of professional training.
spotlight the soccer superstars at the World Cup.
introduce the topic of what makes expert performance.
explain why some soccer teams play better than others.
一段通过一个现象的叙述，引出二段首的观点，此篇文章，主旨句特点比较明显，为段首的问句，问题的答案即为主旨，what might account for
this strange phenomenon?
三、错误选项特点
通过对真题的分析，例证题错误选项的特征多为就事论事，混淆论点论据。见真题如下：
1. The extinction of large prehistoric animals is noted to suggest
that________.
large animal were vulnerable to the changing
environment(文中一段例子中的细节，不可概括主题)
small species survived as large animals
disappeared(文中一段例子中的细节，不可概括主题)
large sea animals may face the same threat today
slow-growing fish outlive fast-growing
ones(与文中一段三句相矛盾，属于一段例子中的细节上的反向干扰。)
综合分析其它三个干扰选项特征其实一句话概括，即题干问为什么举例，而干扰选项在说这个例子本身——就事论事，混淆论点论据。
2. The birthday phenomenon found among soccer players is mentioned
to____.
stress the importance of professional training.
(球员出生现象不能够直接强调职业训练的重要性，此处通过球员出生的例子在没有论证的情况下，还不能得出结论，即天才是后天造就的，文章的论证
是下面的逻辑顺序：球员出生现象的引子——原因的猜测：某些星相学玄学原因?——接着通过埃里克森的实验得出结论：天才是后天造就。该选项跳跃性太强，出
现了逻辑断层。)
spotlight the soccer superstars at the World Cup.
(例证为了引出主题：二段首，卓越的原因，而不是讨论球员本身，选项B非作者意图。)
introduce the topic of what makes expert performance.
explain why some soccer teams play better than others.
(文章中说的是球员，不是球队，属于一段例子中的细节上的偷换概念。)
通过对干扰选项的观察，B、D两个干扰项的特点都是就事论事，讨论例子本身，非作者意图，没有分清论点论据。
页:
[1]